vimothy
yurp
how so?But the overcollateralization seems to help secure their cashflow, in terms of risk minimization, as far as I understand.
how so?But the overcollateralization seems to help secure their cashflow, in terms of risk minimization, as far as I understand.
If they are, then they are masters at it. They market themselves as being maximally compliant, even playfully aiming to "compliantly take over the world."unless they're dodgy af, which is not a given
By minimizing the chances of default, which by extension minimizes the chances that the depositors' funds, which are used as capital to issue the loans, are lost.how so?
yeah, but again, it doesn help them generate the cashflow needed to service their loans, it's just locked up value in case one of their debtors defaultsBy minimizing the chances of default, which by extension minimizes the chances that the depositors' funds, which are used as capital to issue the loans, are lost.
Yeah, and as far as I can tell, their profit model is sound, the risk well handled, and their business compliant with regulators.all good, but the obvs scam is obvs even if they're one of the good ones
The cashflow is generated by the interest paid by borrowers, as well as the profit from NEXO token sale and appreciation.yeah, but again, it doesn help them generate the cashflow needed to service their loans, it's just locked up value in case one of their debtors defaults
The latter arguably helping bootstrap this profit model from an otherwise circular catch-22 arrangement, which you seem to be pointing out.The cashflow is generated by the interest paid by borrowers, as well as the profit from NEXO token sale and appreciation.
thats exactly what I've been saying (minus the token bit)The cashflow is generated by the interest paid by borrowers, as well as the profit from NEXO token sale and appreciation.
And the overcollateralization I think is integral to this profit model being sustainable, especially given how volatile the market it.thats exactly what I've been saying (minus the token bit)
Yeah as I understand the two models, the big differences are that Nexo only offers overcollateralized loans, and the interest it pays to depositors is significantly higher.at this stage it makes total sense I think, its v standard banking model when you think about it
Which may not last, of course. But I don't see why, on a technical level, it can't be sustained.and the interest it pays to depositors is significantly higher.
Yeah the cypherpunk ideal is largely misguided, or at least naive. That said, I think a good bit of the vision will come true, just not all of it.that might bother some ppl, eg cypherpunks who think this is a new paradigm
what's the other model?Yeah as I understand the two models, the big differences are that Nexo only offers overcollateralized loans, and the interest it pays to depositors is significantly higher.