Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
Yeah I was skeptical at first too, but I found that they had all of these money lending licenses across the US (200 jurisdictions worldwide they claim), and evidence aside, even in principle it seems to be in their interest to comply. They could quite reasonably end up being the biggest crypto-native bank in the world.
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
who is lending them dollars?
As I understand it, nobody needs to be lending them dollars for their ongoing business model to work.

All of the assets they support are liquid enough to sell for dollars (up to a point obviously, like selling $10,000,000 worth of ETH at once might require some special market order, if it's possible at all).

Between whatever initial funding they got from investors (don't know that list either), which probably took the form of a NEXO token sale, and whatever proceeds they get from loan interests, I see no reason why that wouldn't be enough to maintain liquidity pools between various asset pairs, including some with fiat.
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
but look, if they have dollar liabilities then they're potentially screwed if crypto crashes
Also here I'm not sure I agree. Sure, if crypto somehow crashes worse than it ever has (which would be saying something), outstanding loans would be liquidated due to depreciating collateral. I'd imagine such worse-case scenarios would effect interest rates paid to depositors, but I don't quite see how it would compromise the actual assets of the depositors, aside from the market-wide depreciation of course.
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
if they have dollars to lend, which you've said they have, then they must have come from somewhere
Yeah and my instinct there is just that they sold some amount of their portfolio to get enough dollars in their liquidity pool system to allow whatever degree of dollar operations their platform experiences. That is, I don't think the dollars they have are necessarily borrowed. It's definitely possible though, although I'd imagine that would be riskier.
 

vimothy

yurp
Also here I'm not sure I agree. Sure, if crypto somehow crashes worse than it ever has (which would be saying something), outstanding loans would be liquidated due to depreciating collateral. I'd imagine such worse-case scenarios would effect interest rates paid to depositors, but I don't quite see how it would compromise the actual assets of the depositors, aside from the market-wide depreciation of course.
bc if you're liabilities are fixed in dollars and your assets are collapsing in dollar value, that creates a problem
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
bc if you're liabilities are fixed in dollars and your assets are collapsing in dollar value, that creates a problem
I agree, that is a problem. And it's possible. But on the assets side, at least overcollateralized loans are safer than uncollateralized loans in this crash scenario, as far as depositors are concerned, even fiat depositors, if I understand correctly. Even if that just means slightly more of a buffer for depositors.
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
Personally I don't know what it would take for a crash like this though. Crypto has lasted this long, despite several flash crashes, even into this crazy sanctions regime. Of course a bigger crash is always possible.
 

vimothy

yurp
Yeah and my instinct there is just that they sold some amount of their portfolio to get enough dollars in their liquidity pool system to allow whatever degree of dollar operations their platform experiences. That is, I don't think the dollars they have are necessarily borrowed. It's definitely possible though, although I'd imagine that would be riskier.
so you think they're selling the loan on to raise dollars?
 
Top