padraig (u.s.)

a monkey that will go ape
I wouldn't use the word want

More like tensions are high and this Israeli regime is such a loose cannon that it's more likely to crack and escalate than Nasrallah. They already did yesterday, hit multiple targets deep inside Lebanon with drone strikes, probably as a message to Nasrallah. With a normal govt you'd just discount it as tough talk, this one is so fucking crazy tho.

Would obv be a terrible idea for number of reasons
 

version

Well-known member
Assuming this account is a genuine Jewish person and not some sort of bot or sock puppet, this is absolutely mental.

 

padraig (u.s.)

a monkey that will go ape
Lmao if you go to the tweet he edited that out and then wrote a comment clarifying that Nazis and the Holocaust were in fact bad, but Hamas is worse
 

DannyL

Wild Horses
Isaac Chotiner did an interview with a hardline settler activist, and it is nuts

If you have any interest in the religious settler mindset, read it

Only caveat I'd make is that religious settlers like her are minority tho a large one (~30-40%, something like that), and that a lot of them are actually there for things like cheaper and partially subsidized cost of living, a kind of securitized suburbia

But she represents the hard edge of settlers who are constantly setting up illegal hilltop outposts, attacking Palestinians and forcing them out, etc. And her part of the settler movement is in the one that's been in power with Netanyahu for the last 15 years, i.e. her neighbor Bezelal Smotrich, and will make any future two-state solution hugely more difficult.
30-40% of the overall Israeli population? That's absolutely huge.
 

padraig (u.s.)

a monkey that will go ape
30-40% of the overall Israeli population? That's absolutely huge.
no, of settlers, who themselves are not quite 10% of Israeli Jews

so more like 3% of overall Israeli Jewish population. which is still quite a large number, on the order of 150,000.

I should be clear that's just a semi-educated guess

there are two main settler parties that hold 1/10 of the current Knesset seats, so it's clearly a significant force in Israeli politics
 

Corpsey

bandz ahoy
chefs-kiss.jpg



It's an astounding and disgusting photo but is it "the culmination of identity liberalism's transformation into genocidal fascism"?

Co-option by genocidal fascism perhaps?

Or is he saying that liberals are so into LBGTQ rights that they're willing to carpet bomb potential homophobes to raise the rainbow flag? (This may well be true of some liberals.)

The photo made me think of tacitus's "they make a desert and call it peace" quote (natch, the only tacitus quote i know)
 

padraig (u.s.)

a monkey that will go ape
It's an astounding and disgusting photo but is it "the culmination of identity liberalism's transformation into genocidal fascism"?

Co-option by genocidal fascism perhaps?

Or is he saying that liberals are so into LBGTQ rights that they're willing to carpet bomb potential homophobes to raise the rainbow flag? (This may well be true of some liberals.)
I think it's about the limitations of identity politics alone without some kind of material analysis, as well as a strong moral compass, to back them up. Cooptation is probably a better word than transformation but it's not exactly either.

This isn't a new thing, the Israeli govt is an old and studied hand at pinkwashing. Undeniably things are bad for queer people in the territories, and significantly better for them in Israel (at least for now). Equally, the idea that Israel is invading Gaza, or that Israelis are shooting Palestinians in the West Bank, to liberate Palestinian queers is obviously absurd. It's just a strategy to change the terms of debate bc Israeli politicians and PR types know well the impossibility of making a public global case for the occupations and massive reprisals on their own terms. it works to some extent, you see it all the time on Twitter and sometimes here i.e. "but Hamas throws gay people off buildings" as if the correct answer to that is to killing 20,000 (or whatever the final number winds up being) Palestinians in Gaza. Usually it's a bit more sophisticated than a guy literally holding a rainbow flag in front of bombed out rubble.

It's also an update and variation on the old civilizing mission as cover for colonialism and its wars. I do think Isr/Pal is more complicated than a lot of the "settler colonialism" rhetoric you see thrown around on the left, but in this sense it's correct, the idea of bringing civilization to a more backward area. You also see it in reference to American and other imperial ventures in the Muslim world. i.e. they repress women, so our bombing is justified. it's never quite a direct argument, more of an elision to sidestep the actual purpose, which is never to liberate oppressed minorities. you can't just say "we're civilized and they're primitive" nowadays, but you can do this pinkwashing bullshit.

Btw the Israeli govt itself is not friendly to queer Palestinians. it has long been criticized for denying them asylum in Israel (which is almost exclusively reserved for cooperators with Israeli security forces), so to see this mix of crocodile tears and pinkwashing triumphalism is especially galling.
 

version

Well-known member
What's been the Republican response to that aspect of the Israeli campaign? Do they just not talk about it due to higher priorities than combating "woke" in this instance?
 

version

Well-known member
This isn't a new thing, the Israeli govt is an old and studied hand at pinkwashing. Undeniably things are bad for queer people in the territories, and significantly better for them in Israel (at least for now). Equally, the idea that Israel is invading Gaza, or that Israelis are shooting Palestinians in the West Bank, to liberate Palestinian queers is obviously absurd. It's just a strategy to change the terms of debate bc Israeli politicians and PR types know well the impossibility of making a public global case for the occupations and massive reprisals on their own terms. it works to some extent, you see it all the time on Twitter and sometimes here i.e. "but Hamas throws gay people off buildings" as if the correct answer to that is to killing 20,000 (or whatever the final number winds up being) Palestinians in Gaza. Usually it's a bit more sophisticated than a guy literally holding a rainbow flag in front of bombed out rubble.

Verso just published a book that touches on this and made it a free download, given the current situation.

 

padraig (u.s.)

a monkey that will go ape
What's been the Republican response to that aspect of the Israeli campaign? Do they just not talk about it due to higher priorities than combating "woke" in this instance?
idk I haven't seen anything. my guess is they just ignore it. a significant portion of the Israeli govt - all the religious settler types I keep talking about, probably the Haredi - is virulently homophobic, and they seem to just ignore this "we're fighting for love" bullshit. it's a pretty small part of the overall Israeli PR effort and directed mainly at Western liberals so probably easy to just look past. hasbara is sophisticated enough to know there's no sense in marketing your pinkwashing to the RW folks or your evangelical alliances to the queers.
 
Top