Reynolds hardcore continuum event

D

droid

Guest
This should be good:

The Hardcore Continuum? A discussion

Presented by the Centre for Cultural Studies Research, University of East London
In association with The Wire (www.thewire.co.uk)

UEL Docklands Campus (Cyprus DLR)

April 29th 2009 2:00pm-6:00pm

Simon Reynolds' commentary on the ‘'hardcore continuum'’ - the mutating sequence of dancefloor music to have emerged from the breakbeat hardcore matrix of the early 1990s - has recently generated intense debate in the musical blogosphere.

What is the value of this concept? Does it still usefully describe the context from which dynamic new beat musics emerge? Can the conditions of creativity in the 1990s be replicated in the era of web 2.0? Should we even want them to be?

Speakers: Mark Fisher (K-Punk), Alex Williams (Splintering Bone Ashes), Steve Goodman (Kode 9), Lisa Blanning (The Wire), Dan Hancox (Guardian, New Statesman), Kodwo Eshun (Author of More Brilliant than the Sun), Joe Muggs (Mixmag, The Wire), Jeremy Gilbert (Co-author of Discographies)

Attendance is free but pre-registration is recommended. For info or to register contact J.Gilbert@uel.ac.uk
 

mos dan

fact music
My comment wasn't directed at you Dan, I just think that the general level of hysteria and attacks on the 'nuum is acting as a magnifier for it's percieved importance.

yeah i know mate, sorry i didn't think you were, i just wanted it stating for the record that i'm pretty wary of this debate (a) getting massively overstated in terms of its importance, and (b) distracting people from the business of actually enjoying dance music. so basically i totally agree with you!

having said that the 29th should be good fun.
 
D

droid

Guest
Yeah, is it being recorded? And more importantly, is the East London massive gonna be waiting outside for K-Punk afterwards? :D
 

blissblogger

Well-known member
you're joking right

i just wanted it stating for the record that i'm pretty wary of this debate (a) getting massively overstated in terms of its importance

i've stayed out of this corner of this discussion so far, but i can't resist signposting the irony of this remark

you're pretty wary of this debate getting overblown which is why

1/ you jumped at the chance to participate in the event on the 29th! and advertised it on your blog before anyone else!

2/ you wrote your piece in FACT!

3/ you and a couple of your netmates started the debate in the first place!

LOL as they say
 

john eden

male pale and stale
i've stayed out of this corner of this discussion so far, but i can't resist signposting the irony of this remark

you're pretty wary of this debate getting overblown which is why

1/ you jumped at the chance to participate in the event on the 29th! and advertised it on your blog before anyone else!

2/ you wrote your piece in FACT!

3/ you and a couple of your netmates started the debate in the first place!

LOL as they say

It's interesting to hear you say that Simon as I wasn't aware of either you or K-Punk naming the critics you were responding to. Is Mos Dan one of these spectral "people who have read deleuze", then?
 

mos dan

fact music
i've stayed out of this corner of this discussion so far, but i can't resist signposting the irony of this remark

you're pretty wary of this debate getting overblown which is why

1/ you jumped at the chance to participate in the event on the 29th! and advertised it on your blog before anyone else!

2/ you wrote your piece in FACT!

3/ you and a couple of your netmates started the debate in the first place!

LOL as they say

oh come on simon :)

i didn't jump at anything, but said 'yes', when asked to participate by nine, like i said above it looks like fun. i posted the details on my personal blog (which no-one reads but close friends rly), copying and pasting it from alex williams' blog - i only knew the full details when i read it on splintering ashes, that was the first i'd heard of any specifics.

when i say i'm wary of it getting overblown, i mean that i'm not sure there's much more that can be added to the debate right now (maybe when more time has passed/perspective gained?) without it getting very circular. i just feel we should all be enjoying the music we love a bit more, and not getting bogged down in the back and forth of the nuum debate. just my personal opinion.

i wrote one piece for fact, and haven't felt the need to write any more! i have been more than happy to let k punk and alex williams have 'the last word(s)' and get on with my life. furthermore, chill!

ps no-one's named them, but bok bok and and wordthecat are my real-mates, as it goes. there is no web conspiracy!
 

mos dan

fact music
Is Mos Dan one of these spectral "people who have read deleuze", then?

i don't know where that quote is from, but not only have i not read deleuze, i'm not sure of the significance of having read deleuze in this context. *goes back to planning his weekend*
 

blissblogger

Well-known member
opaciteee

it didn't seem opaque to me, that bit ;)

but anyways, 94 percent of that talk could hardly have been more clear, starkly laid out or concrete.

while i'm here can i just say to the bloke who knows his physics (and who posts on a thread about jungle/etc musics despite despising the music!), i'm obviously not using "continuum" in the physics sense -- in fact i was unaware it had that meaning. Continuum has a sort of common parlance usage to describe a bunch of things that are linked historically, a thread running through time. The word seemed more attractive to me than "tradition", because tradition sounds a bit stuffy and static, whereas the whole point of the h-core lineage is that it keeps moving, it's always pushing forward.

That's the paradox that has kept me enthralled for so long -- a tradition that keeps moving forward, changing,. Also the balancing act of being open to outside influences yet remaining "relatively self-contained" (whoever said that --padraig? dominic? -- hit the nail on the head).
 

blissblogger

Well-known member
go with the flow

The physics bloke I think is nomadthesecond, who isn't a bloke, btw.

oops, sexist moi

for a moment you had me thinking i was imagining the Deleuzy thing but then i recalled this bit on Bok Bok's blog

"the non-linear fluxuations and INTERNATIONAL flows of ideas is where a real continuum might be traced"

i'm not sure if "fluxuations" is a word but it does have a definite Deleuze-lite vibe about it, no? Not saying he's read D&G but it's easy to pick this stuff up secondhand, on the net (like an STD of the mind).

all that flow talk...

and you know I'm a fan of Deleuze & Guattari, i'm just wary of the techno-utopian spin that was put on it in the 90s in re. the internet etc. Deterritorialisation is what capitalism, unshackled, implements without regard to our needs and interests. It's not always a positive.
 

john eden

male pale and stale
Ah I missed that bok bok bit, see?

D&G seems so open/vague it can be used for all sorts of things, of course.
 

swears

preppy-kei
51RVNpEuI5L._SL500_AA280.jpg
 

padraig (u.s.)

a monkey that will go ape
Top