some of his downtempo jazz type stuff might be a bit questionable tho.
the article is shit and his concluding paragraph about 'two models of blackness', either american jazz-lite thru the bronx or ruffneck from JA is pedantry pure and simple - neither accurate nor diagnostic nor insightful.I was just reading this and was mildly flummoxed to see 1995 S.R. slag of early (as in Studio Pressure/System X/The Sentinel era) Photek as "middlebrow". I mean, I know what he was getting at of course - in retrospect it seems like his valid critique about D&B lite/coffee table/jazz flava was about a year or two ahead of the mark and it nails most of the other producers he mentions
the article is shit and his concluding paragraph about 'two models of blackness', either american jazz-lite thru the bronx or ruffneck from JA is pedantry pure and simple - neither accurate nor diagnostic nor insightful.
SR always has a hard-on to talk about 'blackness' but rarely has anything specific to say AT ALL, and virtually nothing he says would last thirty seconds in a seminar say, on black political thought ... it's not musical analysis, it's not informed by the traditions of black thought, it's not anthropologically informed, it's not even based on 'there in the scene' reportage (by 95 he was in nyc, no?). Totally bogus fluff. Tell me I'm wrong, cos i enjoy and read his books.
well whatever that is, it's not even music criticism or a record review anymore is it? i mean, it's just fluff - completely pointless, vapid, navel-gazing, friend-quoting fluff ... virtually no words about the record, the music, the tracks, anything, just a long fashionista 'discussion' of who likes and doesn't like his beloved animal collectiveAnd right on queue, here is SR's first blog entry for the Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2009/feb/06/simon-reynolds-animal-collective
oh yeah and of course it wouldn't be a simon reynolds piece without an ear-splitting mangling of the english language in the hopes of being cute or cool or relevant or something ... BROMANTICISM, OMG THATS SO CLEVER
the New Bromantics
and suddenly i have very disturbing images of members of Duran Duran smoking a bowl together in a shit car while trying to hide from some dealers/cops/other plot foil, still wearing the puffy shirts.
please kill my imagination
bu bu bu but BUT , neologisms are practically de rigeur for british music critics ! They can't be "grating" ! You have to use them or you're not in the club ! Don't you know ? !!!Middlebrow, Animal Collective, Pretentiousness - and Dissensus doesn't even get a mention.
The neologisms are grating - as if what the world needs is more jargon.