Sectionfive
bandwagon house
Do you think its about time the feds pay a trip to Woofah towers then?
The Times is a brilliant paper, probably the calmest, most honest we have.
Do you think its about time the feds pay a trip to Woofah towers then?
Not trying to stoke up any further arguments, genuinely (!), but the Times is awful right-wing bollocks. I say this as someone who grew up in a house where it was read, and who worked for a little bit at/on T2, albeit a decade ago (awful, AWFUL people in the main - I was there around 9/11, and people were laughing in a oh-aren't-we-so-sophisticated-and-ironic anti-American way the day after it happened, at American people talking on screen. Utter, despicable cunts.). Terrible in almost every conceivable way, hiding under a veneer of respectability and, well, calmness.
I thought even the calmness was lacking when I read the Sunday Times at the weekend. Their long piece on the hacking story talked of the "tyranny of the print unions" and called Ed Miliband and the Guardian lefties in a main news story. It was really shrill. I don't think it's a good paper at all.
Surely resigning doesn't get her out of that one?"Brooks also faced an uncomfortable appearance before MPs on the Commons culture, media and sport select committee on Tuesday along with Rupert and James Murdoch to answer questions about the phone-hacking scandal."
i cant imagine enjoying a pint with many guardian writers either for what its worth.
the guardian is undrrated by you lot though. it is th best paper. it broke all this stuff. wikileaks wouldnet hav teamed up with anyone else in the uk. i like kevin mitchell. i lik the cricket writers. i like larry elliot. ive got time for monbiot. visually its way ahead of the pack. that matters to me. th times is ugly.
I have had a drink with many Guaridan writers who are good people and support the right football teams.
Will it affect what she can say on Tuesday?