He's almost beyond parody at this point.i checked in to see what nick land makes of the situation
"More than a century after Europe descended into the carnage of the First World War, the lights of peace and progress are going out again." -- Trouble is, the lights of peace and progress were a gay disco.
Stan's the bestI may even say totally confused. And I'd say the crux of my confusion is a lack of clarity regarding the nature of NATO and its history with Russia.
At least it's the gays this time, rather than the Jews.He's almost beyond parody at this point.
Nutshell: NATO obv made lots of sense during Cold War as counter to Warsaw Bloc. After Cold War ended, NATO gradually expanded east. Russian leadership always hated it - even Yeltsin blew up @ Clinton multiple times over it - but couldn't do much bc Russia was such a mess, and also they were bought off with electoral and economic support. Ukraine + Georgia were a kind of a red line that everyone tacitly agreed not to cross, then in 08 GW Bush unilaterally was like "let's make Ukraine + Georgia part of NATO". Russia now in better position, promptly invaded more or less to deter former Soviet republics from joining NATO. Then a decade plus of subversion, annexation, proxy warfare, etc in Ukraine, and here we are.I may even say totally confused. And I'd say the crux of my confusion is a lack of clarity regarding the nature of NATO and its history with Russia.
Also I'm unclear on what the direct effects, yet alone what 2nd and 3rd degree effects, cutting Russia out of SWIFT would have. And why have previous sanctions ostensibly failed in deterring this kind of "naked" aggression?
When the West left Afghanistan last year, the speed and success of the Taliban takeover of the country would have delighted Putin. The capitulation of the U.S., the impotence of Europe, and the relative ease with which the militants took control of the Afghan capital within days of the Western retreat made Ukraine seem a tantalizing prospect.
Perhaps Putin thought he’d roll into Kyiv the way the Taliban rolled into Kabul, meeting scant resistance from Ukrainians. He seems to have expected to be welcomed in by Russian-speaking Ukrainians as nostalgic for the Soviet heydays as he is. It seems Putin expected Ukrainians to lay down their arms, and for their pro-Western and NATO President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to flee, making space for one of Moscow’s allies. The Kremlin could roll its tanks back to Russia, taking a sizeable chunk of Ukraine with them, and Putin could declare his bogus “peacekeeping” mission over after a few days. He would take some limited casualties, some painful but not devastating sanctions, and then it would be back to business as usual.
And perhaps if Putin had tried this maneuver during the Ukrainian presidencies of his ally Viktor Yanukovych, or of “chocolate king” billionaire Petro Poroshenko, he might have been able to roll into Kyiv the way the Taliban took Kabul last year.
But Putin underestimated Ukraine. The country’s troops have resisted hard and have largely held their cities against a Russian attempt at blitzkrieg. Kyiv claims that its experienced, motivated soldiers have killed thousands of Russians, downed enemy planes and destroyed hundreds of armored vehicles and tanks.
So, Putin expected Afghanistan in 2021. But he got Afghanistan in 1979. Ukrainians aren’t rolling over or welcoming back an old friend. They, and their president, are digging in for war. Their army is fighting hard. Harsh Western sanctions are targeting Putin and all his oligarch buddies, who were content to keep him in power while it filled their coffers, but who now stand to lose billions.
I gather the UK's are about as effective as being slapped in the face with a paper napkin.Just wondering how harsh are the sanctions actually?
Been getting mixed info on that with various western countries pulling out.
The ones under consideration by US and the ones jointly by US/NATO seem quite harsh, harsh enough to even have a recoil in western economies. The big one was the threat to cut Russia out of SWIFT, which apparently some European nations are against because of the collateral damage. There was also another one US alone could do, and it had something to do with preventing payments from Russian banks and entities from ultimately clearing through US payment systems, but I really don't know how that would work.Just wondering how harsh are the sanctions actually?
Been getting mixed info on that with various western countries pulling out.
Yeah those are the ones I have heard about, my question is, has anything been implemented already apart from some companies blocking their websites in Russia? ie. PornhubThe ones under consideration by US and the ones jointly by US/NATO seem quite harsh, harsh enough to even have a recoil in western economies. The big one was the threat to cut Russia out of SWIFT, which apparently some European nations are against because of the collateral damage. There was also another one US alone could do, and it had something to do with preventing payments from Russian banks and entities from ultimately clearing through US payment systems, but I really don't know how that would work.
I'm hoping US/NATO will manage to focus the sanctions just on Putin's circle, but the damage will probably trickle down.
And also Putin said a while back that if Russia got cut out of SWIFT, it would be interpreted as a declaration of war.