Benny Bunter
Well-known member
Agreed. After I posted that, I did think that there were probably other examples outside of 'poetry' it would apply to.That isn't exclusive to poetry; Joyce, Burroughs, D&G and others have done it too.
Agreed. After I posted that, I did think that there were probably other examples outside of 'poetry' it would apply to.That isn't exclusive to poetry; Joyce, Burroughs, D&G and others have done it too.
That's a great quote. Wallace Stevens' has a poem called Not Ideas About the Thing but the Thing Itself. William Carlos Williams has "no ideas but in things", Pound's imagist manifesto has the "direct treatment of the thing".Here form is content, content is form. You complain that this stuff is not written in English. It is not written at all. It is not to be read -—- or rather it is not only to be read. It is to be looked at and listened to. His writing is not about something; it is that something itself.
Beckett on Finnegans Wake
That's a great quote.
read it already
This is Kant, the noumenon, the thing-in-itself, the ultimately unknowable objective reality of something - perhaps implying a double meaning in that Beckett quote.That's a great quote. Wallace Stevens' has a poem called Not Ideas About the Thing but the Thing Itself. William Carlos Williams has "no ideas but in things", Pound's imagist manifesto has the "direct treatment of the thing".
They don't all mean exactly the same thing, but they're all kind of related ideas that were kicking around in modernism.
That's true, which is why I said they were different but related ideas around at the time. In the end all of it's figurative language though isn't it? There's always some level of abstraction in that sense. With Stevens, he goes very abstract indeed but he says "The real is only the base. But it is the base." So he's not so far off from the imagists as it might seem at first.with wcw and the imagists its not so much the thing in itself in that sense so much as it is about the return to the noun. things. objects. stuff. more specifically, away from abstraction. back to things you can stub your toe against.
That's a great quote. Wallace Stevens' has a poem called Not Ideas About the Thing but the Thing Itself. William Carlos Williams has "no ideas but in things", Pound's imagist manifesto has the "direct treatment of the thing".
They don't all mean exactly the same thing, but they're all kind of related ideas that were kicking around in modernism.
Such latency is legible by fortune at first sight
insistent past provision mutuable re-founded
welded entire stepwise in flicker colouration,
assemblage fringe turbulence recoil observ-
vational pent-up in pathway crystallised
tracing, at ginger-root expressive preser-
vative instated across tincture limit realised.
Adaptive discoverable as beyond exception,
surmounted by cardinal invert numeration,
alleged into transparency icy surface level
fully exceptional eventual, grizzled wherever
in grateful outreach; even at amounted
density, intial within plentiful dual purpose
first overturn sequence device plumage
outliasted at tricuspid. Intensity provoked
I tried and enjoyed some but the effort v reward didn’t match up. In the end I didn’t care enough - the level of abstraction just left me cold. And, for me, he doesn’t have the swing or the rhythms of someone like Pound. But I like to eavesdrop on your conversations and think it’s nice someone is getting something out of what seems like word soup to me.neither of them know how to read it.
Found this on twitter from itthe other Prynne that came out in February, Not Ice Novice, almost seems a total contrast to Latency
because
it rhymes!
Cypher wafer liquid
codeine off therewith
stem or willow viscid
elder for hollow pith
there's an organic versus synthetic thing going on, and a reiteration of themes explored in earlier works...
this reminds me of To Pollen:
As both new fill tooth
indent in want inclined
say all bested at sooth
elegant front refined
More dental work for Jeremy?