Wuhan Killer Sneeze (thanks Tea)

[Rude Velvet]

Forensic Analysis of the 38 Subject Deaths in the 6-Month Interim Report of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trial

...Phase 2/3 of the trial involved 44,060 subjects who were equally distributed into two groups and received Dose 1 of either the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccinated or the Placebo control (0.9% normal saline). At Week 20, when the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. FDA, subjects in the placebo arm were given the option to be BNT162b2 vaccinated. All but a few accepted. Surprisingly, a comparison of the number of subject deaths per week during the 33 Weeks of this study found no significant difference between the number of deaths in the vaccinated versus placebo arms for the first 20 weeks of the trial, the placebo-controlled portion of the trial. After Week 20, as subjects in the Placebo were unblinded and vaccinated, deaths among this still unvaccinated cohort of this group slowed and eventually plateaued. Deaths in the BNT162b2 vaccinated subjects continued at the same rate. Our analysis revealed inconsistencies between the subject data listed in the 6-Month Interim Report and publications authored by Pfizer/BioNTech trial site administrators. Most importantly, we found evidence of an over 3.7-fold increase in number of deaths due to cardiovascular events in BNT162b2 vaccinated subjects compared to Placebo controls. This significant adverse event signal was not reported by Pfizer/BioNTech. Potential sources of these data inconsistencies are identified.

 

[mixed_biscuits]

Forensic Analysis of the 38 Subject Deaths in the 6-Month Interim Report of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trial

...Phase 2/3 of the trial involved 44,060 subjects who were equally distributed into two groups and received Dose 1 of either the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccinated or the Placebo control (0.9% normal saline). At Week 20, when the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. FDA, subjects in the placebo arm were given the option to be BNT162b2 vaccinated. All but a few accepted. Surprisingly, a comparison of the number of subject deaths per week during the 33 Weeks of this study found no significant difference between the number of deaths in the vaccinated versus placebo arms for the first 20 weeks of the trial, the placebo-controlled portion of the trial. After Week 20, as subjects in the Placebo were unblinded and vaccinated, deaths among this still unvaccinated cohort of this group slowed and eventually plateaued. Deaths in the BNT162b2 vaccinated subjects continued at the same rate. Our analysis revealed inconsistencies between the subject data listed in the 6-Month Interim Report and publications authored by Pfizer/BioNTech trial site administrators. Most importantly, we found evidence of an over 3.7-fold increase in number of deaths due to cardiovascular events in BNT162b2 vaccinated subjects compared to Placebo controls. This significant adverse event signal was not reported by Pfizer/BioNTech. Potential sources of these data inconsistencies are identified.

And that's why every British school is receiving a defibrillator.

 

[Mr. Tea]

And yet, by some miracle, the unvaccinated were dying at a rate 15 times higher than the vaccinated in January 2021, when the death rate peaked at 1,500 per day.

 

[mixed_biscuits]

And yet, by some miracle, the unvaccinated were dying at a rate 15 times higher than the vaccinated in January 2021, when the death rate peaked at 1,500 per day.

Why don't you use your 'science' on the paper posted above to work out where it's gone wrong.

The whole premise of that paper is that you can't take the PR at face value, which is what you've done throughout. That's why you're confused by every school getting a defib.

 

[Mr. Tea]

Why don't you use your 'science' on the paper posted above to work out where it's gone wrong.

The whole premise of that paper is that you can't take the PR at face value, which is what you've done throughout. That's why you're confused by every school getting a defib.

Well for a start, a tiny risk multiplied by a number a bit bigger than one - even a scary number like 3 or 4 - is still a tiny risk. A drug that halved your risk of getting any cancer but tripled your risk of being struck by lightning would represent a pretty decent pay-off in terms of risk, wouldn't you agree?

 

[Rude Velvet]

And yet, by some miracle, the unvaccinated were dying at a rate 15 times higher than the vaccinated in January 2021, when the death rate peaked at 1,500 per day.

Define "unvaccinated"

 

[mixed_biscuits]

Well for a start, a tiny risk multiplied by a number a bit bigger than one - even a scary number like 3 or 4 - is still a tiny risk. A drug that halved your risk of getting any cancer but tripled your risk of being struck by lightning would represent a pretty decent pay-off in terms of risk, wouldn't you agree?

You couldn't even get through one single sentence without wandering off topic into an analogy, an analogy which is pointless because it assumes the thing you've been asked to show.

 

[mixed_biscuits]

@Mr. Tea As for heart problem risks, reducing something like that by a small double digit percentage is usually considered notable enough to have it turn up on the front of the national newspapers. A 300% negative swing completely swamps any benefit from statins for instance. Maybe it would undo ALL positive measures available.

 

[Mr. Tea]

Define "unvaccinated"

You fucking wot m8. I know things like this are very difficult for you but the clue really is in the word itself.

 

[Rude Velvet]

Fuck, you're a credulous moron.
One participant who received moderna (and died) rather than Pfizer was counted as invaccinated too. That's the level of fraud we're dealing with here

 

[Mr. Tea]

@Mr. Tea As for heart problem risks, reducing something like that by a small double digit percentage is usually considered notable enough to have it turn up on the front of the national newspapers. A 300% negative swing completely swamps any benefit from statins for instance. Maybe it would undo ALL positive measures available.

Well HMG has quoted some unsourced claims that could have come from anywhere at all. The adverse cardiac events mentioned in connection with covid vaccines in any reputable source I've seen have put the additional risk factor, as far as excess deaths are concerned, at the rate of one in several hundred thousand. Which pales into insignificance next to an order of magnitude decrease in risk of death from a virus that killed about one person in a hundred that it infected.

 

[Mr. Tea]

Fuck, you're a credulous moron.
One participant who received moderna (and died) rather than Pfizer was counted as invaccinated too. That's the level of fraus we're dealing with here

Better call the Fraus Hotline!

 

[mixed_biscuits]

Well HMG has quoted some unsourced claims that could have come from anywhere at all. The adverse cardiac events mentioned in connection with covid vaccines in any reputable source I've seen have put the additional risk factor, as far as excess deaths are concerned, at the rate of one in several hundred thousand. Which pales into insignificance next to an order of magnitude decrease in risk of death from a virus that killed about one person in a hundred that it infected.

You don't even know when vaccinated people were routinely counted as 'unvaccinated' - something they were upfront about right from the start.

 

[Rude Velvet]

risk of death from a virus that killed about one person in a hundred that it infected.

Jaw-dropping ignorance. You're only a couple of orders of magnitude out, at best.
Did your cobwebbed and randomly-disintegrating skeletal remains accidentally type this nonsense?
Should we send help?

 

[Rude Velvet]

Here you go, chief

Forensic Analysis of the 38 Subject Deaths in the 6-Month Interim Report of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trial

The analysis reported here is unique in that it is the first study of the original data from the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine clinical trial (CA4591001) to be carried out by a group unaffiliated with the trial sponsor. Our study is a forensic analysis of the 38 trial subjects who died...

www.preprints.org

 

[CorpseysEvilTwin]

Jaw-dropping ignorance. You're only a couple of orders of magnitude out, at best.
Did your cobwebbed and randomly-disintegrating skeletal remains accidentally type this nonsense?
Should we send help?

@malelesbian you're needed to show hmg some unconditional love, sugarplum. I'll leave you to it. Extract him from the manosphere!

 

[Mr. Tea]

You don't even know when vaccinated people were routinely counted as 'unvaccinated' - something they were upfront about right from the start.

Hospitalisation and death rates were routinely published for those who'd had no covid jab, and those who'd had one, two or three shots. I don't see why this is such a tough concept for you to grasp, but I've long ago given up trying to guess whether you're playing dumb on purpose or just very stupid.

 

[Mr. Tea]

Jaw-dropping ignorance. You're only a couple of orders of magnitude out, at best.
Did your cobwebbed and randomly-disintegrating skeletal remains accidentally type this nonsense?
Should we send help?

Everything I've said is verifiable true.

Can I remind you that a couple of years ago you confidently predicted that everyone who got a covid vaccine would soon be dead from kiLlEr bRaIn pRiOns? Your credibility here is sub-dogshit.

 

[Clinamenic]

Your credibility here is sub-dogshit.

For anyone not familiar with the technical nomenclature of statistics, "sub-dogshit" is really bad, while "dogshit" statistics are barely enough to make the grade in some applications.

 

[Mr. Tea]

For anyone not familiar with the technical nomenclature of statistics, "sub-dogshit" is really bad, while "dogshit" statistics are barely enough to make the grade in some applications.

Stan knows the score.