line b

Well-known member
I enjoyed it. A million thousand times better than Bodega. Ill have to listen more to say anything smart though
 
  • Love
Reactions: sus

DannyL

Wild Horses
If indie pop evolved more in this direction I might like it much more. Pure serotonin firing rackety digital soul.

Bob Stanley is an interesting one. He has an approach to music very similar to our own, which is why you can get on with him. Rooted in record collecting, I can hear shades of Morricone and 60s girls groups in that tune.



His English Weather comp is great

 

woops

is not like other people
seems like the term indie has been pretty much debased by this point in the thread where folk music like Ys that's not indie at all comes under the same umbrella as all kinds of total shit. saint etienne likewise are not an indie band or sound in the slightest. the strokes or whatever shit 00s band you want to name are not indie either. although they are shit. they're new wave revival. in this thread indie means white
 

DannyL

Wild Horses
I'm very serious. I won't meddle anymore. It's not my place. The board is your space, and I'm a guest.
Post about what you like, for real, but other people might chose to highlight things you're not interested in, or take the conversation in a different direction. I'm not saying "anyone who listens to Joanna Newson is a racist" - would be tough for me, as I actually owned Ys for a bit (still might do), I'm just saying I know I bought it because of all the praise heaped on it in the music press of the time and that's a product of indie-ish stuff having that cultural hegemony.... and that's connected with whiteness.

I mean to me, race leaps off the page the moment I think about someone like Newson. Is that weird? It's literally one of the first things that occurs to me. Perhaps I'm so used to thinking about music in that racialised light, idk.
 
Last edited:

DannyL

Wild Horses
seems like the term indie has been pretty much debased by this point in the thread where folk music like Ys that's not indie at all comes under the same umbrella as all kinds of total shit. saint etienne likewise are not an indie band or sound in the slightest. the strokes or whatever shit 00s band you want to name are not indie either. although they are shit. they're new wave revival. in this thread indie means white
x post sorry.

Yeah, it is weird, and she's a massive outlier in that field anyway due to her instrument choice.

Very odd when you think it originally referred to stuff like The Field Mice or similar shit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sus

woops

is not like other people
yes that's exactly what i mean. obviously i'm not going to get very far trying to convince people on here that there's a difference between mumfords and the guitar bands i like. might as well spam my list of 100 records yet again
 
  • Love
Reactions: sus

shakahislop

Well-known member
Five minutes in, my main impression is that for some reason it reminds me of the kind of aesthetic that the rich girls in my school would have liked. Which is the same impression that I've had the other times I listened to it. I think it's the lyrics partly using kind of a fantastical vocabulary, that sounds a bit like a victorian book. And maybe that there's something about the structure of the songs, which reminds me of a musical. I'm not saying that you're a rich girl at my school suspended, just that I have an inbuilt gut reaction against anything these phantoms from years ago would be into.

Have to say perhaps the J train at 5am isn't exactly the intended environment for this kind of thing.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sus

DannyL

Wild Horses
I liked your chart, Woops. Suspended, Luke was a being an arse in that thread as well. It's not just you. He's an equal opportunities online bully.
 

shakahislop

Well-known member
She tends to come into my consciousness through the indie world, and good for her because there's a lot of money in getting to those kinds of ears, but I don't think this sounds like indie at all. It sounds more like Daniel Johnson or something 'outsider' like that. Can't think of a category it fits into except possibly it sounds a bit like 'early music', kind of medieval. I mean there's definitely something historical about her sound and her lyrics.
 

sus

Moderator
I understand that, or I understand it better now after you explaining it to me, and it makes sense. I think the sweeping generalization about black music not being allowed to transcend being pigeonholed as subculture is pushing it—speaking for America, black music has dominated the charts since the midcentury, and I can list hundreds of albums by black artists that are taken Very, Very Seriously as art, from Coltrane to Kanye.

Yes there will always be Karens screaming about profanity in rap. And I get the frustration of seeing one art form struggle while NME celebrates mediocrity. (Though remember, people who love, say, Animal Collective and Xiu Xiu and Dirty Projectors also think NME cover bands are trash.)

And I get DannyL's comment about seeing race in the economic machine that pushes for someone like Newsom. I mean, there's a lot more, we have talked about her family upthread, her blood is basically Cali Mafia. But hip-hop sells several orders of magnitude more than Joanna Fucking Newsom—just because fucking grime never mainstreamed doesn't mean the white people get this special ticket to record sales. Just look up the wealthiest musicians, they're almost all black, dude. That's not to say there isn't racism in the system; it's to say that the situation isnt like the cut and dry picture of privilege you present. The marginalization complex you're stirring up is too hysterical to be accurate or nuanced.

But the bigger point is I don't like listening to music, or experiencing art, as an extension of race or class warfare. Which is how it often feels here, cf Woops' comments on the board's use of "indie" as a descriptor for "white." (Which would be a bit more understandable if the board werent basically all white, but actually black music nerds give more a shit about white indie than y'all do.)

The point is, I think y'all are wasting your life seeing art through an antagonistic perspective. You could just as easily become obsessed with how Scandinavian music producers groped Kesha, and how terribly misogynistic the industry is. Imagine not being able to enjoy a movie because it was funded by Harvey Weinstein. The dude was evil and the dude gave money to a movie that he thought would make him money. That's it. Can we enjoy Samuel Jackson's performance in Pulp Fiction now, of is it hopelessly tainted?

I'm an ape on a spinning marble trying to feel something beautiful before the universe collapses into entropy. That's what it's always been, even for the "dirt poor kid in a black neighborhood" y'all are fetishing, who listens to grime or reggaeton or whatever. They didn't listen to music as fucking activism, they listened to it as life force. Privilege and inequality are real, and worth pushing up against. But at the end of the day, we are all equally doomed and insignificant, we all have narrow windows of experience before we become dust. And spending your time enacting race war over a some harp music—why? Solidarity is the only humane response among the doomed. If I found an angle by which to argue that Newsom was a disadvantaged underdog, would you finally fuck with Ys? And is it me missing the point here, or you?
 

sus

Moderator
And I stick to my guns that the aversion to someone like Newsom here and more broadly seems primarily identitarian and sociological. Those aren't quite the words I want but I don't have better ones. Mood affiliation, maybe. Having the right vibe, having the right dress demeanor posture attitude orientation to the world. All the comments against her have basically been like shakahslop's—too precious, like something rich boarding school girls would like. Too twee. Too whimsy. Smug and pretentious.

That doesn't mean you have to fuck with it. We all have a right to listen to the music that resonates with our own moods. But the reason people don't fuck with it feels more social and interpersonal than about the music itself. There is plenty of misogyny in these kinds of sociological critiques, both upthread and in general, like saying black music feels too "raw" or "urban" or "aggressive." And those angles have been conveniently ignored in favor of the racial angle by which Newsom is Dominant Hegemonic Culture to be resisted. When the reality is a buncha macho boys scared of liking a white girl playing harp and singing about goldfish!
 

sus

Moderator
We are enacting a sociological battle that isn't ours, is what I'm trying to say, and perhaps we could be less sincere and fanatical dupes and proxies in that war, a bit more detached and self-aware of the contingency and partiality of our positions, perhaps reject the battle lines completely.
 

Murphy

cat malogen
How many other people on this board put that kinda effort into arguing the merits of the things they care about

WYH's Top 100 springs to mind.

think I’m up to about 353, poor time management but outstanding taste

anyway, enjoy the roasting squire
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sus

DannyL

Wild Horses
Yeah
I wanted to come back to this. Even if the hegemony formally ended in 2008, the thing that Danny is talking about is it was given serious critical consideration prior to that. Our music never was, only retroactively, once the social energies powering it had been dissipated. and actually, you can even see this in people who subscribed to the continuum (see K-Punks comments on the has hip hop been aesthetically brutalised thread) just complete dismissal under the guise of a faux-modernism. It's ironic then that K-Punk didn't like Newsom. When did pitchfork start to really talk about rap? 2009-2010, when its main culture had died out. But instead of being honest and admitting they fucked up, they'll pretend they were always into it. So it's like for us, well if you're not going to value our music as having artistic merit, then we don't want to be part of your art circus. And this is where I think you got unstuck last night when you were like this is not a subculture. Because it was valued beyond subculture, black pop or black dance forms never really are.
Yeah. No one had to shimmy up on top of a tower block to broadcast Joanna Newson.
 

luka

Well-known member
I don't care that she's white I just find it bit twee and girly. Just not my cup of twee. Find the voice grating. Hate Kendrick Lamar and his grating voice too.
 

...

Beast of Burden
seems like the term indie has been pretty much debased by this point in the thread where folk music like Ys that's not indie at all comes under the same umbrella as all kinds of total shit. saint etienne likewise are not an indie band or sound in the slightest. the strokes or whatever shit 00s band you want to name are not indie either. although they are shit. they're new wave revival. in this thread indie means white

The indie purist strikes back! Hands off my Sarah records!
 

woops

is not like other people
I understand that, or I understand it better now after you explaining it to me, and it makes sense. I think the sweeping generalization about black music not being allowed to transcend being pigeonholed as subculture is pushing it—speaking for America, black music has dominated the charts since the midcentury, and I can list hundreds of albums by black artists that are taken Very, Very Seriously as art, from Coltrane to Kanye.

Yes there will always be Karens screaming about profanity in rap. And I get the frustration of seeing one art form struggle while NME celebrates mediocrity. (Though remember, people who love, say, Animal Collective and Xiu Xiu and Dirty Projectors also think NME cover bands are trash.)

And I get DannyL's comment about seeing race in the economic machine that pushes for someone like Newsom. I mean, there's a lot more, we have talked about her family upthread, her blood is basically Cali Mafia. But hip-hop sells several orders of magnitude more than Joanna Fucking Newsom—just because fucking grime never mainstreamed doesn't mean the white people get this special ticket to record sales. Just look up the wealthiest musicians, they're almost all black, dude. That's not to say there isn't racism in the system; it's to say that the situation isnt like the cut and dry picture of privilege you present. The marginalization complex you're stirring up is too hysterical to be accurate or nuanced.

But the bigger point is I don't like listening to music, or experiencing art, as an extension of race or class warfare. Which is how it often feels here, cf Woops' comments on the board's use of "indie" as a descriptor for "white." (Which would be a bit more understandable if the board werent basically all white, but actually black music nerds give more a shit about white indie than y'all do.)

The point is, I think y'all are wasting your life seeing art through an antagonistic perspective. You could just as easily become obsessed with how Scandinavian music producers groped Kesha, and how terribly misogynistic the industry is. Imagine not being able to enjoy a movie because it was funded by Harvey Weinstein. The dude was evil and the dude gave money to a movie that he thought would make him money. That's it. Can we enjoy Samuel Jackson's performance in Pulp Fiction now, of is it hopelessly tainted?

I'm an ape on a spinning marble trying to feel something beautiful before the universe collapses into entropy. That's what it's always been, even for the "dirt poor kid in a black neighborhood" y'all are fetishing, who listens to grime or reggaeton or whatever. They didn't listen to music as fucking activism, they listened to it as life force. Privilege and inequality are real, and worth pushing up against. But at the end of the day, we are all equally doomed and insignificant, we all have narrow windows of experience before we become dust. And spending your time enacting race war over a some harp music—why? Solidarity is the only humane response among the doomed. If I found an angle by which to argue that Newsom was a disadvantaged underdog, would you finally fuck with Ys? And is it me missing the point here, or you?
another rousing post, suffice to say that the debate on authenticity has been had to death here and even moreso elsewhere and never reached any kind of conclusion. and i don't expect it to this time either. i think, though, or like to think, that if i post some music here it's because it sounds good and not as some broadside in a culture war.

The indie purist strikes back! Hands off my Sarah records!

fuck that, if you look at my legendary list there's hardly any jingle jangle twee stuff on there
 
Top