Martin Dust
Techno Zen Master
For real, Paul. In the morning there's a hard lesson of yes you can have the changes and here's the cost phone call...
you have to present them with only one solution. and looking directly into their eyes with fiery conviction. this in my experience.clients who always pick the worst solution.
that's what i try and do now; do it once and get it right the first time.you have to present them with only one solution. and looking directly into their eyes with fiery conviction. this in my experience.
however i am dealing right now with a client who wants "edge", but cannot specify what this means.
But does that saying exist in Sweden except as a translation of that rule? Because if not that's trivial. You're just saying that "prove means confirms" which it does now - my point is that "prove" used to also mean "test" and that usage has almost died out except in that phrase but with the more common usage that phrase is meaningless.The verbatim translation of the Swedish version of it is «the exception that confirms the rule». So now you know.
But does that saying exist in Sweden except as a translation of that rule? Because if not that's trivial. You're just saying that "prove means confirms" which it does now - my point is that "prove" used to also mean "test" and that usage has almost died out except in that phrase but with the more common usage that phrase is meaningless.
"Exception probat regulam [Lat.], the exception proves the rule. A legal maxim of which the complete text is: exceptio probat [or (con)firmat] regulam in casibus non exceptis--`the fact that certain exceptions are made (in a legal document) confirms that the rule is valid in all other cases.'"
The application is this. Suppose a law is stated in such a way as to include an exception, e.g., "Parking is prohibited on this street from 7 AM to 7 PM, Sundays and holidays excepted." The explicit mention of the exception means that NO other exceptions are to be inferred. Thus we should take the Latin verb probare in the maxim to have the sense of "to increase the force of."
And don't get me fucking started on "could of"/"should of", misplaced apostrophes, 'definately', 'lazer', 'euthenasia'...
Gabriel, as soon as I saw this thread I thought you'd pop up with one of your pet hates, but as yet you haven't. Perhaps I've exaggerated in my mind the extent to which people saying 'Trivial Pursuits' maddens you?
people who aren't very educated but want to sound educated
The 'myself' thing annoys me greatly, I think someone may have mentioned it in this thread already.
I find it's used by (sorry) people who aren't very educated but want to sound educated - they try to be "more correct than correct", and end up using words incorrectly as a result.
Same goes for use of 'I', as in "that conversation between you and I", sort of thing.