Sorry if I'm going too out of topic, but how is Planet Mu's "parasitism" any different that what hardcore did with acid house, or what UK garage did with US garage, UK funky vs US funky, etc.
regardless of your personal affinity with the music, I mean
the description used only really makes me think of Venitian Snares, which ... I never really got![]()
![]()
Good question. I think that on some level it ultimately isn't any different, but the reasons people might regard them as different are probably as follows.
First of all, there's the implied class and pop/art distinctions betweent the source and the 'parasite' that will inevitably make the question a bit loaded when it comes to IDM artists/labels drawing on non-IDM sources.
Secondly - and this is probably the argument with more objective backing - with, e.g, ardcore drawing on previous house and techno, you could say that it transformed the sources in such a way that it formed new musical conventions that in turn formed the basis for a substantial new musical genre. Whilst with Planet Mu artists, the accusation would be that they draw on existing conventions just to fuel their own idiosyncratic personal projects, so it's sort of like an energy drain that doesn't lead anywhere.
That argument might have had some bite in the late 90s, but I'm not sure how relevant it is now: on the one hand, there is much more of this kind of music about, so it must have some kind of generative power that takes it beyond individual artists, and on the other hand, as Ben points out, most of the curren PM artists come from a background in concrete scenes like dubstep, where to some extent they are already established and accepted. So it becomes less accurate to talk of some small 'Planet Mu elite' that take ideas without feeding them back anywhere.
Good question. I think that on some level it ultimately isn't any different, but the reasons people might regard them as different are probably as follows.
First of all, there's the implied class and pop/art distinctions betweent the source and the 'parasite' that will inevitably make the question a bit loaded when it comes to IDM artists/labels drawing on non-IDM sources.
Secondly - and this is probably the argument with more objective backing - with, e.g, ardcore drawing on previous house and techno, you could say that it transformed the sources in such a way that it formed new musical conventions that in turn formed the basis for a substantial new musical genre. Whilst with Planet Mu artists, the accusation would be that they draw on existing conventions just to fuel their own idiosyncratic personal projects, so it's sort of like an energy drain that doesn't lead anywhere.
That argument might have had some bite in the late 90s, but I'm not sure how relevant it is now: on the one hand, there is much more of this kind of music about, so it must have some kind of generative power that takes it beyond individual artists, and on the other hand, as Ben points out, most of the curren PM artists come from a background in concrete scenes like dubstep, where to some extent they are already established and accepted. So it becomes less accurate to talk of some small 'Planet Mu elite' that take ideas without feeding them back anywhere.
Yeah, fair enough, I wouldn't say that, I'll freely admit I got my facts wrong on my assumption this was drill'n'bass part 2 or like those horrible MC Hammer mash-ups or whatever else they've done in the past.yeah but these aren't parasitic idm artists playing at dubstep, these are dubstep artists releasing on planet mu.
It's weird cos it's like saying 'what are you doing releasing/listening to that music?' and who the fuck is anyone to say that?
I think it's a bit more complicated than that, tbh.So yeah, my aside about parasitism was on the assumption their roster was largely dicks trying to "improve" on a trend in dance music by making it fiddly and complicated. I guess Tentative Andy has been there already, but since I started it, I said "parasitism" because to me it's a total one-way street to use those awesome innovations / all that vitality as your jumping off point for your own music, while you (or at least your fans?) are also looking down your noses at it.
Another way to read it is that it's saying "I hate this music, and here's an adjective that describes something I think is shit about it". I'm most definitely not trying to claim to be right or remotely objective in my assessment of this carry on.Firstly, the use of the word 'parasitism' seems like a deliberately loaded choices of word to describe the one way traffic of influence - it's another way of saying "not only am I not particularly arsed with the music - I'm objectively right to not like it because look - it's structurally parasitic."
Yeah, that's entirely fair. The Wyatt quote's great too. Totally relate. I've often tried to make my own music ruffer / less gentrified or whatever, but it always feels so totally forced and ... not me. I'm a cheery nerd from a comfortable background in quiet ol' New Zealand.I don't think the implied harm to dance music exists - it's not like Squarepusher was going around melting down Foul Play dubplates to make his tunes. It could equally be drawn in terms of a bunch of creative artists finding methods and ideas where they can and using them to acheive their own ends.