found some fascinating stuff regarding ancient connections. after collecting the following excerpts i realized that they are from but 1 section of a work called "Polynesian Pathways By Peter Marsh". this chapter is "Ancient Americas", among other chapters with titles like "Ancient Asia". among other things it examine the criss crossing inter-connectedness of ancient cultures by following linquistic, genetic, and artistic strands, offering a vision of shared ancestry entirely mind boggling in its complexity.
so keep that in mind, and at the link at the end use aarows at bottom of page to navigate:
article places Atlantis somewhere in the middle of the Atlantic ocean, and as some kind of meeting point of ancient american and celtic cultures:
[/B]
excuse the hurried cut and paste editing job. tried to sum up key points. but time is running out, and there is still a part of this that i have not read, including things like this:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the above are all from this chapter:
http://www.users.on.net/~mkfenn/page9.htm
here are all the chapters of the paper:
http://www.users.on.net/~mkfenn/index.html
Click languages in Africa ...
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/01/science/01eden.html?scp=4&sq=&st=nyt
I'd have made a much better anthropologist than physicist.![]()
He also reckons today's Brits are descended mainly from neolithic people from Iberia, and that the idea that we're (they're) all derived from Celts, Vikings etc. is largely untrue.
Who has been overwritten ?
its never been disputed that the iberians were in britain and are part of our genetic inheritance. its textbook stuff.
They are finding older art...
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/science/14venus.html?ref=global-home
we have been thinking all along that Sumer was the first civilization, but this is beginning to be clearly false as excavations have been going on in recent years, and is still continuing, in present day Turkey, Iraq, etc., which is uncovering a previous civilization which pushes everything back another 5000 years at least.
giant stone pillars up to 20 meters tall which were used as part of temples to which people came from hundreds of kilometers to worship are being unearthed, and the date of their construction is said to be somewhere around 10,000 BC. (5000 years before the Sumerians in Mesopotamia).
this was related to me by a friend keen on such matters over some bad sushi saturday night, and has been on my mind ever since. i've been doing a bit of googling but i think none to very little information is available at this point as the excavations are still under way.
in archaeology circles it is certainly the norm for dates to be pushed back and back time and again as new discoveries surface, and people have been conjecturing about this for sometime, but I was still very much surprised to hear of it -- even though it does make sense somehow.
just yesterday at the Russian shop next door, where i was purchasing some frozen dumplings:
me: yeah i know how to cook them as they are almost exactly the same as dumplings in China.
shop woman: oh? it all comes from Italy like Pasta.
me: um.... no...
My brain obviously escaped washing.