I don't think you understand the difference between targeting innocent people on purpose and accidental collateral damage.I have no idea that gibberish is supposed to mean.
Basically you've talked yourself into a position whereby Israelis have human rights, while Palestinians don't, but also whereby Palestinians have moral agency, but Israelis don't. Thus when Hamas kills 1,000 Israeli civilians, it's Hamas's fault for being wicked racist terrorists, but when the IDF kills 20,000 Palestinian civilians, that's also Hamas's fault for not surrendering.
I'm trying to make the situation more accessible to the constituency on this forum.are you admitting to engaging in date rape? because this is.. a curious analogy here.
I don't see how Israel would consider a two-state scenario feasible.especially as we've conclusively established you cling to the superstition of a two state solution, a solution which was even impossible in 1993. this is what being an idealist does to an mf. your poxy intellect has only led you to flights of fancy.
I don't think you understand the difference between targeting innocent people on purpose and accidental collateral damage.
I don't see how Israel would consider a two-state scenario feasible.
I think that's kind of the very strong unspoken, implied bit of the article - the AI is providing a pretext which allows israel to decimate gazaI've been wondering this too. The article someone posted above said they'd struck 15,000 targets in the first few weeks of the war, which is presumably a small fraction of the total they've identified. But the Gaza Strip is slightly smaller than the Isle of Wight, so if it's that "target-rich" then you kind of think they might as well assume that every house, apartment, shop, garage or potting shed in the entire territory is "potentially" harbouring Hamas militants.
I guess it wasn't enough to pass a resolution prohibiting criticism of Israel under a vague definition of antisemitism by 412-1, as there's now a new resolution up for consideration in the House that explicitly states anti-Zionism is antisemitism, which I'm sure is news to the many Jewish critics of Zionism
You know the current situation is not equivalent to a proper two-state solution...otherwise why would people be clamouring for the two-state solution all the time?There is already a two state scenario in all but name. So Israel doesn't need to consider it. Are you some kind of masochist who has made his entire personality crapping on progressives that you have forgotten to update your brain since 1992? We're at windows 11 and you're still in the days of ms-dos. Even climatic boy feels shame for the poverty you are experiencing at present.
This is a conspiracy theorist!I think that's kind of the very strong unspoken, implied bit of the article - the AI is providing a pretext which allows israel to decimate gaza
Your criterion for genocide makes pretty much all serious warfare 'genocidal'. We've noticed that you haven't attempted to confute the claim that, given Hamas surrender, Israel would not go on to slaughter either civilians or even the soldiers that have given in.Israel is very clearly doing the former. They've explicitly admitted it. You're on a busted flush here. Literally the only way you can continue to deny that the IDF is deliberately killing civilians is deny that any civilians exist in Gaza (despite most deaths being those of women and children), or to deny that Palestinians are human beings at all, which I think is probably your actual position here.
I reject your premise that Israel has no choice but to carry on murdering civilians until Hamas gives up. The power imbalance aside, that's no different from saying that Hamas has no choice but to carry on murdering Israeli civilians until the Israeli government gives up.Your criterion for genocide makes pretty much all serious warfare 'genocidal'. We've noticed that you haven't attempted to confute the claim that, given Hamas surrender, Israel would not go on to slaughter either civilians or even the soldiers that have given in.
You just don't accept that there's any kind of difference in their approaches.I reject your premise that Israel has no choice but to carry on murdering civilians until Hamas gives up. The power imbalance aside, that's no different from saying that Hamas has no choice but to carry on murdering Israeli civilians until the Israeli government gives up.
There is a huge difference. Israel's civilian kill count is - so far - well over an order of magnitude higher than Hamas's, and could go another order of magnitude higher by the time the dust has settled.You just don't accept that there's any kind of difference in their approaches.