Lou Dobbs suggested the Trump campaign pay Elias five hundred million dollars to sit it out and stop making them look stupid.
Granted I'm no expert on either economics or on China, but I just watched a talk about China's new five year plan, and I don't see how dual circulation is "darkly pessimistic" - then again, could just be alluring wording for this article.I read this earlier and it seems to be a byproduct of the election- its interesting that these sort of articles now talk as if external powers view Biden as a sort of sea change, that of the kind that would anticipate large scale changes in global approach
You see this talk in global warming discussion as well
Anywy
China’s Radical New Vision of Globalization
President Xi’s vision of “dual circulation” is a darkly pessimistic economic strategy, fit for a new Cold War.www.noemamag.com
And now Texas is suing a number of suits at the Supreme Court to strike off their electors....
It is possible—likely, even—that Paxton is advancing this nonsense because he has been under indictment since 2015 for securities fraud, is now under investigation by the FBI for bribery and abuse of office, and is hoping to impress Trump enough to get a presidential pardon. Just today, the FBI issued at least one subpoena for records from Paxton’s office. Knowing that this lawsuit has virtually no chance of winning, he could file it and win points with Trump while also knowing it would go nowhere.
Granted I'm no expert on either economics or on China, but I just watched a talk about China's new five year plan, and I don't see how dual circulation is "darkly pessimistic" - then again, could just be alluring wording for this article.
Just seems to involve a split-priority between national and global - not sure how the logistics pan out, but I guess I can see how that can seem suspicious from a purely globalist perspective. But hasn't covid demonstrated the potential wisdom in hedging your bets like this, rather than leaning on the international trade circuitry with your full weight?
no i didn't - I thought about it briefly but then, like you said, no one was discussing trump's attempt to overthrow the american govt, so the best I could do would be to spam random linkscool let's look at yr sources. cos did you actually, like, read any of them?
you mean the one called "What Can You Do If Trump Stages a Coup?" 🤔the first Atlantic piece says
but not a non-violent coup, a kind of friendly over-throwing of the government - thats totally reasonable?but it's a real stretch to say that any are predictions of a violent coup.
sorry, there was no hysterical wave of *violent* coup predictions - it was a wave of qualified *non-violent* coup predictions, which is a totally different thingso like, either find better sources - if it's so easy that shouldn't be a problem - or stop trying to make it seem like there was a hysterical wave of violent coup predictions that totally failed to materialize
Paul Pascrell (D-NJ) has circulated a letter stating that since 106 Republicans believe the 2020 election was a fraud, those returning to Congress based on their own recent victories in it should not be seated. How can they accept their seat if the election was fraudulent?